SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vinay Kumar B @ Vinay vs State Of Karnataka on 17 January, 2020

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8527 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

Vinay Kumar.B @ Vinay
S/o.Basavaraju
Aged about 32 years
R/at. No.53, 16th Cross
J.P.Nagar, 6th Stage
Bengaluru – 560 048.
…Petitioner
(By Sri.Vijay Shetty, B.Advocate)

AND:

State of Karnataka
Represented by
Puttenahalli Police Station
Bengaluru – 560 078
Represented by Government Advocate
High Court Building
Bengaluru – 560 001.
… Respondent
(By Sri.Thejesh.P., HCGP)

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.
210/2019 of Puttenahalli P.S., Bengaluru City for the
offence p/u/s 498A, 506, 304B R/W 34 of IPC and Sections
3 and 4 of D.P.Act.
2

This Criminal Petition coming on for orders, this day,
the Court made the following:

ORDER

This petition is by Accused No.1 in Crime

No.210/2019 registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 498A, 304B and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC

and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner.

3. Learned High Court Govt. Pleader has not filed

any statement of objection, but has orally opposed the

petition.

4. There is no dispute that the marriage between

petitioner and the deceased was performed on

15.02.2019. On account of certain dispute between the

deceased and her in-laws, it is stated that the petitioner

and the deceased had set up a separate house. The

allegations made in the chargesheet go to show that the

deceased did not want her in-laws to know her
3

whereabouts. However, it is alleged that on the date of

the incident, the petitioner herein called her mother and

disclosed his whereabouts, which is alleged to have

provoked the deceased to commit suicide.

5. It is stated that Accused Nos.2 to 5 are already

enlarged on bail by orders of this Court in Criminal Petition

No.7771/2019 dated 25.11.2019. The investigation is

completed and incriminating evidence in support of the

prosecution case is already collected by the investigating

agency, hence, the custody of the petitioner is not required

for the purpose of investigation or for eventual trial.

6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed.

a) Petitioner/accused No.1 is ordered to be

enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond in a

sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs

only) with two sureties each for the

likesum to the satisfaction of the

jurisdictional court.

4

b) Petitioner shall appear before the court as

and when required.

c) Petitioner shall not threaten or allure the

prosecution witnesses in whatsoever

manner.

d) Petitioner shall not get involved in similar

offences.

e) Petitioner shall not leave the territorial

limits of the Trial Court without prior

permission of the Trial Court.

Sd/-

JUDGE

bnv*

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation