SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vinay Prakash Yadav And 5 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 19 July, 2019


?Court No. – 44

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. – 19502 of 2019

Petitioner :- Vinay Prakash Yadav And 5 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Mustafa

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon’ble Ramesh Sinha,J.

Hon’ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

Sri Ranvijay Singh, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3 today in Court, which is taken on record.

Heard Sri Mohd. Mustafa, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ranvijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3, Sri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.

This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. dated 28.4.2019, registered as case crime No.99 of 2019, under Sections 498A, Section323, Section504, Section506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Jaitpura, District Varanasi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/s submits that he is not pressing this petition so far as it relates to quashing of impugned FIR. He further submits that in view of the notification No.1058/79-V-1-19-1 (Ka)-20-2018 dated 6th June 2019, provisions of anticipatory bail have been made applicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh and, therefore, the petitioner/s may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. before the competent Court.

Counsel for the petitioner/s further submits that Registry may be directed to return certified copy of the F.I.R.

Learned State Counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent no.4 have no objection to this proposition.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed, as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.

Needless to state that in the eventuality of filing any such application by the petitioner/s, the same would be decided in accordance with law.

Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the FIR to the counsel for the petitioner/s after accepting xerox copy of the same.

(Pankaj Bhatia,J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)

Order Date :- 19.7.2019/NS



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation