HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3432/2019
1. Vinod Kumar Sharma Son Of Late Shri Jagdish Prasad
Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, B/c Brahmin R/o Village
Devliya Thikariya, Tehsil Sanganer, Police Station Bagaru,
District Jaipur.
2. Smt. Bara Ji Devi Wife Of Late Shri Jagdish Prasad, B/c
Brahmin, R/o Village Devliya Thikariya, Tehsil Sanganer,
Police Station Bagaru, District Jaipur.
—-Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Mrs. Neelu Sharma Wife Of Vinod Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 23 Years, B/c Brahmin R/o Village Madrampura
Diggi Road, Sanganer, Jaipur.
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kaswa
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma
For State : Mr. Arvind Kumar Chawla, P.P.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
31/05/2019
1. Petitioners have preferred this Criminal Miscellaneous
Petition seeking quashing of proceedings in Criminal Case
No.36/2016 pending before Judicial Magistrate No.1, Jaipur.
2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that parties have
amicably settled the dispute and they have entered into
compromise. Learned Court below has compounded the offence
under Section 406 I.P.C but as the offence under Section 498-A of
I.P.C. is non-compoundable, the same was not compounded.
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 05:32:56 AM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3432/2019]
3. It is contended that an application under Section 13-B of the
Hindu Marriage Act has been moved. It is also contended that
balance amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- would be given to complainant
on 12.06.2019 before the Family Court.
4. Complainant is present in person in the Court who has not
disputed the fact that parties have amicably settled the dispute.
She has no objection to the quashing of the criminal proceedings
pending before the Court below.
5. I have considered the contentions.
6. In view of the fact that parties have amicably settled the
dispute, the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed and
proceedings in Criminal Case No. 36/2016 pending before Judicial
Magistrate No.1, Jaipur are quashed. Stay application stands
disposed.
8. However, it is made clear that if petitioner does not pay the
balance amount as agreed between the parties, complainant
would be free to move an application before this Court for
appropriate orders.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Simple Kumawat/159
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 at 05:32:56 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
