SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Virendra Singh S/O Mohan Singh B/C … vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 20 December, 2018

(1 of 2 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2164/2018

Virendra Singh S/o Mohan Singh, B/c Jat, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Hansasar Police Station Sadar Jhunjhunu District
Jhunjhunu.
(Presently The Appellant Is Lodged In District Jail Jhunjhunu
In Judicial Custody)
—-Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
—-Respondent

For Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Rahar
For Respondent : Mr. R.S. Raghav, P.P.

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Judgment
20/12/2018

Defect pointed by the office has already been removed

as the appellant has withdrawn the petition filed by him

under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Appellant has filed this appeal under Section 14-A(2) of

The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No.

225/2018 registered at Police Station Sadar, District

Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 341, 323, 342, 365,

377 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as

‘I.P.C.’) and Section 67-A of The Information Technology Act,

2000 and Sections 3(1)(e), 3(1)(da), 3(1)(gh), 3(2)(v) of

The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989.

(2 of 2 )

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that it

is a case of version and cross-version. Injured has suffered

simple injuries. As per the medical opinion, no injury was

seen on the anal region of the victim. Hence, the allegation

levelled by the victim qua offence under Section 377 I.P.C. is

not corroborated by the medical evidence. Appellant is in

custody since 9.10.2018. Presently, appellant is in judicial

custody and is not required for further investigation.

Appellant had also suffered injuries in the occurrence.

Appellant is not involved in any other criminal case.

Learned State Counsel, has opposed the appeal.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the

case, it would be just and expedient to order the release of

the appellant on bail.

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the

merits of the case, this appeal is allowed. Appellant be

admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.

(SABINA)J.

Mohita/7

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation