SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Visakh Surendran vs The State Of Kerala on 14 February, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 25TH MAGHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.9303 OF 2019

CRIME NO.2242/2019 OF ADOOR POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA

PETITIONERS:

1 VISAKH SURENDRAN
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O.SURENDRAN G., SOUMYA BHAVAN, THEPPUPARA.P.O.,
EZHAMKULAM, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

2 RAMANY N.
AGED 58 YEARS
W/O.SURENDRAN G., SOUMYA BHAVAN, THEPPUPARA P.O.,
EZHAMKULAM, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

3 SURENDRAN G.
AGED 61 YEARS
SOUMYA BHAVAN, THEPPUPARA P.O., EZHAMKULAM, ADOOR,
PATHANAMTHITTA.

BY ADVS.
SRI.NOBEL RAJU
SRI.C.R.JAYAKUMAR
SMT.P.K.VINAYA

RESPONDENT:

THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, REPRESENTING THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
ADOOR, PIN-682031.

By SHRI.AMJAD ALI, SR.PP

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
BA No.9303 of 2019 2

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under

Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The petitioners are the accused in Crime

No.2242 of 2019 of Adoor Police Station, registered for offences

punishable under Sections 498A read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code. The de facto complainant is the wife of the first

accused. The prosecution case, in essence, is that the accused

subjected the de facto complainant to cruelty while they were

residing together.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as

also the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. Having regard to the nature of the offence as also

the relationship between the parties, I am inclined to grant

anticipatory bail to the petitioners on the following terms:

i) The petitioners shall make themselves available for
interrogation before the Investigating Officer within
ten days from today. They shall also make
BA No.9303 of 2019 3

themselves available for interrogation before the
Investigating Officer as and when directed by the
Investigating Officer in writing to do so;

ii) If the petitioners are arrested prior to, or after their
appearance before the Investigating Officer in terms
of this order, they shall be released from custody on
execution of bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two
sureties each for the like sum.

(iii) The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate
the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to
tamper with the evidence of the prosecution.

iv) The petitioners shall not involve in any other
offence while on bail.

Sd/-

P.B.SURESH KUMAR

pkk JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation