$~36
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: February 14, 2020
+ W.P.(CRL) 464/2020 and CRL.M.A. 3425/2020
VISHAL ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Mr. S.K. Choudhary, Advocate
alongwith all petitioners (except
petitioner no.5) in person
versus
STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu,
Additional Standing Counsel
(Criminal) for the State with Mr.
Shivom Saharon and Mr. Hitesh
Vali, Advocates with SI Tinku
Shoken, P.S.: Tilak Nagar
Respondent no.2/Complainant in
person
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT
BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)
Quashing of FIR No. 1354/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34
IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the
ground that the matrimonial dispute stands amicably settled between the
W.P.(Crl.) 464/2020 Page 1 of 2
parties vide Compromise Deed dated 20th March, 2017 and petitioner
No.-1/husband and respondent No.2/wife are living together happily for
last two years.
Respondent No.2, present in Court, submits that the dispute with
the petitioners has been amicably resolved and she is happily and
peacefully living with petitioner no.1/husband and therefore, the FIR in
question and proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed.
Petitioner No.1/ husband and respondent No.2/wife are present in
Court and they have been duly identified by Investigating Officer of this
case.
In view of the fact that respondent No.2, who is the complainant of
FIR in question, is happily living with petitioner No.1/husband, FIR No.
1354/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station
Tilak Nagar, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom, are hereby
quashed qua petitioners.
The petition alongwith pending application is disposed of
accordingly.
(BRIJESH SETHI)
JUDGE
FEBRUARY 14, 2020/savita
W.P.(Crl.) 464/2020 Page 2 of 2