SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vishal Sharma vs Ut Of Chandigarh & Anr on 1 December, 2017

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M- 9451 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : December 01, 2017

Vishal Sharma …..Petitioner

Versus

State of U.T. Chandigarh and another ….Respondents

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Mr. Shubham Jain, Advocate for
Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Ashima Mor, APP, U.T. Chandigarh.

Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate
for respondent No. 2.

***

LISA GILL, J.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 1 dated 03.01.2017 under Section 498A IPC registered

at Police Station Women, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

It is submitted that the parties have amicably resolved the

dispute before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court.

Settlement/agreement dated 11.09.2017 is attached with this file. Petition

under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed by the

petitioner and respondent No. 2. Their statements at first motion have been

recorded and part of the settled amount remitted by the petitioner. The

petitioner undertakes to abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement

in letter and spirit. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

1 of 2
09-12-2017 00:54:35 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 9451 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 affirms and verifies the

factum of settlement between the parties and submits that respondent No. 2

has no objection, in case, this petition is allowed subject to strict adherence

by the petitioner to the terms and conditions of the settlement.

Learned counsel for the U.T. Chandigarh verifies that the

petitioner has joined investigation.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above,

especially the settlement between the parties, but without expressing any

opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just and expedient to allow

this petition. Consequently, order dated 22.03.2017 is made absolute.

However, liberty is afforded to respondent No.2 to move an

appropriate application in this matter, in case the terms and conditions of

settlement between the parties are not adhered to by the petitioner.

(Lisa Gill)
December 01, 2017 Judge
rts
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
09-12-2017 00:54:36 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh