SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vivek Garg vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 December, 2018

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2893/2018

1. Vivek Garg S/o Vinod Kumar Garg, Aged About 32 Years,
B/c Agarwal, R/o 5495-Anaj Mandi, Ambala Cantt.
Haryana, Presently R/o At 1408-Hendry Circle, Standford
Heights, Rocklin City, California Usa.

2. Vinod Kumar Garg S/o Lt. Sh. Arjun Dev, Aged About 64
Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o 5495-Anaj Mandi, Ambala Cantt.
Haryana

3. Smt. Umesh Bala W/o Vinod Kumar Garg, Aged About 63
Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o 5495-Anaj Mandi, Ambala Cantt.
Haryana

4. Vishal Garg S/o Vinod Kumar Garg, Aged About 33 Years,
B/c Agarwal, R/o 5495-Anaj Mandi, Ambala Cantt.
Haryana

5. Smt. Sapna Garg W/o Vishal Garg, Aged About 34 Years,
B/c Agarwal, R/o 5495-Anaj Mandi, Ambala Cantt.
Haryana

6. Smt. Shailja Garg W/o Sh. Gaurav Goyal, Aged About 35
Years, R/o 1251-Ff, Sec-15-Ii, Gurgaon, Haryana.

7. Gaurav Goyal S/o Sh. Parveen Goyal, Aged About 36
Years, R/o 1251-Ff, Sec-15-Ii, Gurgaon, Haryana.

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan.

2. Priyanka D/o Pradeep Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 28
Years, B/c Agarwal, R/o H.no. 2A, Sukhariya Nagar,
Sriganganagar

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Umesh Srimali.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.MS Panwar, PP.

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

19/12/2018
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-2893/2018]

1. The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc.

petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR

No.38/2017 registered at Police Station Mahila, District Sri

Ganganagar for the offence under Sections 498A 406 of IPC.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the matter has been fully compromised between the

parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners has shown certified

copies of the orders in other cases pertaining to same matrimonial

dispute, in which compromise has been reflected. Learned counsel

for the petitioners submits that the petitioners shall produce all

the documents relating to compromise before the I.O.

3. In light of the such submission, the present petition is

disposed of with a direction to the I.O. to take the compromise on

record and complete the investigation strictly in accordance with

law. The petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with FIR

No.38/2017 registered at Police Station Mahila, District Sri

Ganganagar.

4. However, if during the investigation, the concerned

investigating authority needs to arrest the petitioners, then the

petitioners shall be given 15 days notice before making such

arrest. The petitioners shall be at liberty to approach this Court

again, in case need arises. However, it is made clear that the

petitioners shall be required to join and completely co-operate

with the investigation.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
45-SPhophaliya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation