SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Yashpal vs State Of U.P. And Another on 22 July, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 70

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 27984 of 2019

Applicant :- Yashpal

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Pavan Kishore,Piyush Kishore Srivastava

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 06.07.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.17, Meerut in Criminal Revision No. 74 of 2019 (Yashpal Vs. State of U.P. and another) arising out of case crime no. 0220 of 2017 as well as order dated 07.02.2019 and proceedings of case no.251 of 2019 (old no. 1537 of 2018), under Sections 498A, Section354, Section376, Section323, Section504, Section506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Delhi Gate, District -Meerut pending in the court of Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut.

The learned counsel for the applicant after advancing his arguments at some length, gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned order dated 06.07.2019 against the applicant and requested to grant some protection, so that applicant may surrender before the court below. The learned counsel for the applicant further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application and prayed that a direction be issued to the courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously in accordance with law.

Considering the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that in case applicant appears before the concerned court below within 45 days from today and applies for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with settled law laid down by the Seven Judges’ decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Criminal Law Journal 755 as well as judgement passed by Hon’ble Apex Court in (2009) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 437 Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

For the period of 45 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

With the above observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

Order Date :- 22.7.2019

AK Pandey

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation