On a New Zealand TV program (the video noticeable taken down very quickly) a 21-year-old Australian mother is advertising for sperm to impregnate herself from more male donors with the expressed purpose of having 11 kids from 11 different men. She proudly states that she wants no man in her life, or any father in the childrenâ€™s lives. She wants lots of children and has a planned target of 11. Her choice is based upon being entirely supported by the government. This modern woman promises not to ask for any contribution from any of the fathers (donâ€™t hold your breathe), but it isnâ€™t clear whether the government will heavy handedly not go after the sperm donors as lately this aspect of non-support for sperm has come under question in the US and other countries.
This is all a step further down the social suicide, as this women is announcing it to the world before she goes on her quest to have 11 kids and tap out the sperm bank nearest you.
We will surely hear that once the children are born that we shouldnâ€™t be so heartless as to not fund this Medusaâ€™s brought up flock, as the children are not at fault in this mess as she will no doubt get a huge fund to bring up so many kids! So we as taxpayers must fund this feminist mother desires or be angry white males. Aussie men will be paying for this one way or the other as such taxes are mainly taken from the blood, sweat and tears of men, such as those who die in dangerous professions.
No representative of fathersâ€™ groups was interviewed for the news item, the usual fair and balanced news we come to expect in Helengradâ€™s feminist New Zealand and in our own countries? The feminist ideology has so effectively become part of the average states belief system that now they are probably gallingly pushing this woman as a kind of test case (which will open the flood gates to any women wishing to have a flock of her own).
The state will either stop this woman from her sperm bank sphere (and thus control a womanâ€™s body, I can hear the hysterical chants now) or let her do all her little Medusa mind desires.
The young woman in question and her mother expressed confidence that the biological father involvement is irrelevant to childrenâ€™s development, and the state will have to take the Mangina role for some time to come, in doing whatever this women wants (as she has attached herself, as many women do, so tightly to the children). There is no hiding this taking from men to fund womenâ€™s choice, via the states cut, any more. This canâ€™t go on much longer, for the apologists are already doing insane metal gymnastics to excuse such women and under the pathetic guise of chivalry find some man to blame and punish.