Dateline: Nashville, USA
By: Timocrat
From: Fathers & Families Blog
Via: The Honor Network
Priority News Exchange Program News Item (PNEP)
With more women voting in almost every western nation, and both major political parties jumping over themselves as suitors to the female vote, is there any need to take the voting rights away from men? It would seem so for in Nashville TN USA they are moving to take away deadbeat males voting rights. Since most court ordered financial support amounts, from such fathers, are set and frozen at the older higher levels of income earned, while still married, this means that a majority of such men will lose voting rights.
In this story below they center on black men in relation to Jim Crow laws (the old southern Confederate use of laws to deter blacks men from voting). This may explain the probable future US President Obama’s blaming of family break up (and all later problems) on black males/fathers. For if such men lose the vote as in Tennessee then they will have to be blamed, if you want to get elected by all the dead beat & nasty mothers. Yet what we truly see here, in this article below, is the establishments need to cater to feminism, and satisfy their growing fear of the male backlash that they must see brewing and growing in rage.
| Quote: |
| Poll taxes — a Jim Crow practice designed to keep African-Americans and poor people out of the voting booth — returned to Tennessee?
In 2006, the Tennessee legislature passed reforms to allow convicted felons to regain voting rights after serving their time. Amendments were attached specifying that voting rights could not be regained unless all criminal restitution payments and child support were current. Approximately 48% of Tennessee male prisoners are African American, and the vast majority of those of all races who are behind on child support are indigent. So the bottom line is, Tennessee has come up with yet another way to keep large numbers of African Americans and poor people from voting. The American Civil Liberties Union – initially a supporter of the reform effort — sued Tennessee state and county officials in February to eliminate the provisions about child support and restitution. It represents three men who have served their time but cannot regain the right to vote because of the amendments. |
In these laws we can see much more, when added to mandatory seats for women in many European parties. The removing of the voting public from actually voting for an individual candidate, added to the parties removing of the public from voting for a party’s nominee, all point to an eating away of the rights of the voting public (IE male voting public) to have any checks and balance on how the country is run.
Elite males of course still have their power and will be able to use money and power to get what they want, with prenups and their like, yet for middle class males and lower class males the jig is up as your votes are being taken away by the nibbling of ducks. Will single unwed males be soon behind? I’m sure the state can call them selfish bachelors males, or some term that will prey on your dislike of any other male that isn’t exactly like you. Sure laugh now, but many in the past laughed at ideas that are now coming to the nanny states.
For more click: http://fathersandfamiliesblog.org/?p=658
