MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: Sections 364

Limitation for preferring appeal against order of acquittal by victim would be 90 days in all cases, other than the cases instituted upon complaint.

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD  Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION U/S 372 CR.P.C. (LEAVE TO APPEAL) No. – 351 of 2017 Applicant :- Mast Ram Tiwari Opposite Parties :- State of U.P. & 3 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for…

Continue Reading… Limitation for preferring appeal against order of acquittal by victim would be 90 days in all cases, other than the cases instituted upon complaint.

498A, bail after 4 years Jail

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. – 53 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 11816 of 2016 Applicant :- Padma Bhushan Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gufran Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A….

Continue Reading… 498A, bail after 4 years Jail

Whether electronic justification is accessible in deficiency of certificate as per S 65B of justification Act

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2012 1. Balasaheb Gurling Todkari, Age. 51years, Occ: Agriculture, 2. Popat Dattu Mane, Age. 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, 3. Shivaji Tulshiram Koyalkar, Age. 58 years, Occ:…

Continue Reading… Whether electronic justification is accessible in deficiency of certificate as per S 65B of justification Act

Whether joint disclosures by two accused are admissible in evidence?

Posted on      by      Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 467/2010 Kishore Bhadke Vs. State of Maharashtra Dated:Dated: January 3, 2017. Citation: 2017 ALLMR(CRI)1316 SC These appeals are filed by the original accused No.1 (Crl.A.No.854/2010), accused No.3 (Crl.A.No.467/2010) and accused No.6 (Crl.A.No.11/2015). They…

Continue Reading… Whether joint disclosures by two accused are admissible in evidence?
CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation