MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Whether applicant can ask for inspection of premises under Right to Information Act(RTI)?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) 3883/2022

VEENA JOSHI

Vs

CPIO,CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ORS.

CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

Dated: 12.07.2022

1. This writ petition is directed against an order of 28 September 2021 in terms of which an application made by the petitioner purporting to invoke the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 has come to be rejected.

2. From a perusal of the application as tendered, it transpires that the petitioner was essentially aggrieved by non-completion of certain civil works in a government quarter which had been allotted to him. It was in that connection that the provisions of the Act were sought to be invoked.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the inspection of premises and properties would fall within the ambit of the Act in light of the provisions made in Section 2(j). According to learned counsel, the use of the word “work” in Section 2(j) would indicate that the provisions of the Act could extend to the prayers as made and laid before the respondents.

4. In the considered opinion of this Court, the aforesaid submission is thoroughly misconceived for the following reasons.

5. The Act essentially confers a right on citizens to seek information. It enables them to secure information that may be within the control and possession of public authorities. When Section 2(j) uses the word “work”, it is referring to the inspection of documents and records and it is in that light that the said phrase is liable to be understood. The word “work” is to be read in conjunction with the expressions “documents” and “records”. It thus must necessarily draw color therefrom.

See also  Is it mandatory to register arbitration award if property more than Rs 100/ is transferred by said award?

6. As this Court construes the provisions of the Act, it is manifest that the application that was made was thoroughly misconceived.

7. The writ petition consequently must also suffer a similar fate. It shall accordingly stand dismissed with costs quantified at Rs.5,000/- to be deposited at Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee [DHCLSC].

YASHWANT VARMA, J.
JULY 12, 2022.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


COMPARATIVE TABLES
IPC and BNS(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
CRPC and BNSS(Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Evidence Act and BSA(Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Delhi Police Guidelines for Arrest/Bail Application under Section 406/498a IPC
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation