MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Children have right to love and affection of parents and grandparents

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.242 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1371 OF 2022 Gaurav Suresh Tingre …Petitioner Versus Priyanka Gaurav Tingre …Respondent Mr. Ajinkya Udane for the Petitioner. Ms Gauri Godse, i/b. Mr. Rohit Joshi for…

Child’s Father entitled to visitation rights

Allahabad High Court Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. – 1224 of 2019 Petitioner :- Abhinay Jain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Narain Khare,Gopal Khare Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ved Prakash Ojha Hon’ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J….

Mother directed to drop child to Father house in child visitation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2501 OF 2021 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2484 OF 2021 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2274 OF 2021 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2021 WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2021…

C I R C U L A R by FAMILY COURT, MUMBAI on Parenting Plan

FAMILY COURT, MUMBAI ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, B WING, BANDRA EAST, BKC, MUMBAI -400051 Tel/Fax 022-26591270 Email: fc-bhc@nic.in Family Court, Mumbai. Dated :- 4th March, 2022. : C I R C U L A R : For introducing Concept of Parenting Plan to Duty Holders and Litigants…

30 Minutes a month vitual child visit is not enough

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAT.APP.(F.C.) 119/2021 and C.M. No. 45488/2021 SAMRAT SINGH RAWAT ….. Appellant Through: Appellant in person. versus POONAM RAWAT ….. Respondent Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E…

Shared Custody

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.484 and 509 of 2021 COMMON ORDER: Both these Revisions arise out of the common order dt.11-01-2021 in I.A.No.572 of 2020 in I.A.No.255 of 2018 in O.P.No.1365 of 2017 of the Judge, Additional Family Court at Hyderabad….

visitation rights of child cannot be taken away

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 1966 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP No. 31615 of 2014) ROXANN SHARMA …… APPELLANT Vs. ARUN SHARMA ……RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL No. 1967 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP No. 32581 of…

Inter continental Joint Custody

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3559 OF 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 12910/ 2020 (Diary No.8161 of 2020) Smriti Madan Kansagra … Appellant Versus Perry Kansagra … Respondent JUDGMENT INDU MALHOTRA, J. Leave granted. 1. The…

Father contact with his son via video-conference

Calcutta High Court 17.08.2020 C.O. 1159 of 2020 with CAN 4782 of 2020 (via video conference) Dipankar Dey Versus Debasree De & Ors. Ms. Sananda Ganguli ….for the petitioner. Mr. S. Ray, Mr. A. K. Jha ….for the respondent no.1. The instant revisional application has…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation