MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Supreme Court alters order requiring father to visit son in court premises considering welfare of son

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2437/2023

VERSUS

JUDGMENT

Date : 03-10-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The Family Court, through its order dated 10.11.2023, had granted the visitation rights of the child to the petitioner-father herein between 11:00 a.m. to 04:00 p.m. on Sundays in court premises. The High Court, did not however, interfere with the said order. It is in that light, the petitioner-father is before this Court.

In a matter of the present nature, it is needless to mention, as rightly observed by the High Court, the welfare of the child is also to be kept in view by the Court. However, at this stage we find that the repeated visitation rights in the Court premises, would also not be in the interest of the child as the environment during which the visitation rights are exercised, would also matter.

Therefore, at this stage, we see no reason to dispose of the instant petition but we direct that the visitation rights, as granted by the Family Court, shall stand altered for the present whereby the interim custody of the child shall be made over to the petitioner-father by the respondent-mother at the entrance of the RP Mall, Kollam, Kerala at 11:00 a.m on Sundays. The petitionerfather may take the child to the said mall and exercise the visitation rights till 02:00 p.m. of the same day. The custody of the child shall be made over to the respondent-mother at the same spot (entrance of the mall) where the child was made over to the petitioner-father at 02:00 p.m. The said arrangement shall continue on the Sundays, as has been ordered by the Family Court and a further consideration would thereafter be made by this Court.

See also  What is distinction between Acquiescence and Laches?

List the matter on 31.10.2023.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


COMPARATIVE TABLES
IPC and BNS(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
CRPC and BNSS(Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Evidence Act and BSA(Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Whether Son can claim Right or Share in parents' Flats while they are alive?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation