MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Supreme Court Deprecates Impleading Judges In Petition Challenging Grant Of Bail

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 

VINEET SARAN; C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.

Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 48/2022.

BALAKRAM @ BHURA

Vs

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ORS.

This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Magistrate granting bail to respondent nos. 2 to 5. Firstly, we see no reason why the petitioner should have filed this writ petition challenging the order of the Magistrate directly in this Court. Further, we also fail to understand why the Judge granting bail has been impleaded by name as respondent no.6 and also the Additional District Judge, who has refused to interfere with the order passed by the Magistrate has been impleaded by name as respondent no.7. The said conduct of the petitioner is deprecated.

We, thus, dismiss this writ petition with cost of Rs. 5,000/-. The cost be deposited with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Welfare Fund within four weeks from today.

See also  Whether person inducted by court receiver can claim protection of rent law?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


COMPARATIVE TABLES
IPC and BNS(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
CRPC and BNSS(Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Evidence Act and BSA(Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Delhi HC: Relevancy and admissibility of portion of affidavit evidence need not be adjudicated at an interim stage, they can be decided at the time of final hearing
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation