MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whether Incorrect Statement in a Vakalatnama would volume to Forged Document

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.855 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7252 OF 2016) SASIKALA PUSHPA AND OTHERS …Appellants VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU …Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.856 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7287…

Strangulation can't be pronounced to be an Act of Extreme Cruelty for Denying advantage of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 839 OF 2019 [Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.9781 of 2018] Rambir …Appellant Versus State of NCT, Delhi …Respondent J U D G M E N T R. Subhash Reddy, J. 1. Leave granted. 2….

Whether Service of a Bishop can be Labelled as a ‘Personal Service’

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya Judgment on : 17.04.2019 C.O. No. 863 of 2019 Church of North India Vs. Rt. Reverend Ashoke Biswas For a postulant : Mr. Samrat Sen, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Baid,…

A Criminal Trial can't be Equated with a Mock Scene from a Stunt Film

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 473­474 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2453­2454 of 2016] Sachin Kumar Singhraha …..Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh …..Respondent JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. Leave granted. 2. The First Additional…

By Mere Clever Drafting, Plaintiff can't move Suit within Limitation Period

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2960 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 20068 of 2013] Raghwendra Sharan Singh .. Appellant Versus Ram Prasanna Singh (Dead) by LRs .. Respondent JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J. 1. Application…

Church and Cemetery can't be Confiscated by Anybody

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.HRISHIKESH ROY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2019/22ND PHALGUNA, 1940 W.P(C).No.33282 OF 2018 PETITIONERS: ST.MARYS ORTHODOX CHURCH (KATTACHIRA PALLI), KATTACHIRA, BHARANIKKAVU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA…

Mere Disclosing Names of Accused can't be pronounced to be Strong and Cogent Evidence

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 456 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P (Crl.) No. 208 of 2019) PERIYASAMI AND ORS. ……..APPELLANTS Versus S. NALLASAMY ……..RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Hemant Gupta, J. The benefaction interest is destined opposite an sequence upheld…

Whether Reports of Mediator / Counsellor were Confidential in Custody or Guardianship Cases ?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1694 OF 2019 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.9267 OF 2018) PERRY KANSAGRA ……Appellant VERSUS SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA ..…. Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This seductiveness hurdles a…

Slapping father in participation of others not adequate to uncover Instigation to Commit suicide

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment indifferent on: 22nd November, 2018 Judgment delivered on: 08th January, 2019 CRL. REV. P. 330/2017 MS SHIKHA GUPTA ….. Petitioner versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ….Respondent Advocates who seemed in this case: For a Petitioner…

Section 94 Cr.P.C. – Summons to Produce Document

Karnataka High Court Decided On Oct-25-2016 Criminal Petition No. 7053 of 2013 connected with Criminal Petition No. 5821 of 2013 Judge Anand Byrareddy Dr. Y. Manjunath and Another Vs. State of Karnataka Judgment: Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. These petitions are listened and likely of by…


Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation