MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Section 145, Indian Evidence Act does not apply to prove “omissions” in witness statements during criminal trial

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   Present: The Hon’ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi & The Hon’ble Justice Suvra Ghosh CRA 709 of 2014 Md. Irfan & Ors.-vs-The State of West Bengal With CRA 719 of 2014 Md. Akran @ Gabbar @ Gubbar…

Lawyer engaged by Victim to assist Public Prosecutor cannot make oral Argument/Cross Examine Witnesses

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1727 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7848 of 2019] Rekha Murarka …..Appellant Versus The State of West Bengal and Anr. …..Respondents J U D G M E N T MOHAN…

A Criminal Trial can't be Equated with a Mock Scene from a Stunt Film

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 473­474 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2453­2454 of 2016] Sachin Kumar Singhraha …..Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh …..Respondent JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. Leave granted. 2. The First Additional…

Factors guiding exercise of discretion by Judge under Section 231 (2) CrPC, “practice guidelines” for trial court in conducting criminal trial stated

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1321 OF 2018 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4652 of 2018] State of Kerala …Appellant Versus Rasheed …Respondent J U D G M E N T INDU MALHOTRA, J. Leave granted….

Property Issue – 498A Quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-28371 of 2008 Date of Decision:21.05.2012 Sanjiv Kumar ……Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate,for the petitioner. Mr.Kartar Singh, Deputy Advocate General,…

498A, Dv Act Case Transfer Dismissed

Madhya Pradesh High Court Smt. Taramani Parakh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 January, 2017 MCRC 6051/2015 Shri M.K. Jain, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.D. Agarwal, Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1/State. None for the respondent No.2. Shri Pawan Vijaywargiya, counsel for…

Criminal trial, evidence can be recorded by video conferencing

Supreme Court of India Bench: S.N. Variava, B.N. Agrawal CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 476 of 2003 Appeal (crl.) 477 of 2003 PETITIONER:The State of Maharashtra P. C. Singhi RESPONDENT:Dr. Praful B. Desai Dr. Praful B. Desai and another DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/04/2003 BENCH: S.N. Variava…

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation