MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Circumstantial evidence on Two views – Acquitted

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:SHARAD BIRDHI CHAND SARDA Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT17/07/1984 BENCH:FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA VARADARAJAN, A. (J) MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) CITATION: 1984 AIR 1622 1985 SCR (1) 88 1984 SCC (4) 116 1984 SCALE (2)445 CITATOR INFO : D 1988 SC1101…

Dying Declaration is not admissible for Conviction under S.498A IPC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.93 OF 2003 Subhash s/o Purandas Pawar, Age-26 years, Occu:Nil, R/o-Mordal Tanda, Dhule, Dist-Dhule. …APPELLANT (Orig. Accused) VERSUS The State of Maharashtra …RESPONDENT Mr. N.S. Ghanekar Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R.V. Dhasalkar,…


Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation