MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Circumstantial evidence on Two views – Acquitted

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:SHARAD BIRDHI CHAND SARDA Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT17/07/1984 BENCH:FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA VARADARAJAN, A. (J) MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) CITATION: 1984 AIR 1622 1985 SCR (1) 88 1984 SCC (4) 116 1984 SCALE (2)445 CITATOR INFO : D 1988 SC1101…

Dying Declaration is not admissible for Conviction under S.498A IPC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.93 OF 2003 Subhash s/o Purandas Pawar, Age-26 years, Occu:Nil, R/o-Mordal Tanda, Dhule, Dist-Dhule. …APPELLANT (Orig. Accused) VERSUS The State of Maharashtra …RESPONDENT Mr. N.S. Ghanekar Advocate for Appellant. Mr. R.V. Dhasalkar,…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation