MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Is false implication fabrication of evidence

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(Crl.) Nos.35/07, 36/07, 37/07, 38/07, 39/07, 56/07, 438/07 and 634/07 RESERVED ON: December 07, 2007 DATE OF DECISION: February 15, 2008 (1) W.P.(Crl.) Nos.35/07 SHYNI VARGHESE ORS. ….Petitioners through: Mr. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashish…

Circumstantial evidence on Two views – Acquitted

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:SHARAD BIRDHI CHAND SARDA Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT17/07/1984 BENCH:FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA VARADARAJAN, A. (J) MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) CITATION: 1984 AIR 1622 1985 SCR (1) 88 1984 SCC (4) 116 1984 SCALE (2)445 CITATOR INFO : D 1988 SC1101…

False Implication Becomes Fabrication Of False Evidence.

Delhi High Court Shyni Varghese And Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) And … on 15 February, 2008 Equivalent citations: 147 (2008) DLT 691 Bench: R Khetrapal JUDGMENT Reva Khetrapal, J. 1. The petitioners seek issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature…

When prosecution for cheating is liable to be quashed?

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3723 / 2016 Jugal Kishore Vs. The State of Rajasthan HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order 24/08/2017 1. The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing…

Copyright © 2018 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh