MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Same Lawyer can represent against clients 2nd Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION  NO.115  OF 2014 Rajiv Hiranandani     … Petitioner V/s. Namrata Zakaria … Respondent Ms.Edith Dey, for the Petitioner. Ms.T.F.Irani, for the Respondent. Both the parties are present. CORAM :  REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED  : 30th  July, 2014. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner herein, is challenging the order dated 3rd December, 2013, passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Bandra, Mumbai,   below Exhibit – 6 in Petition No.C­141 of 2012, by which  the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.50,000/­,  by way of ad­hoc interim maintenance. 3. By consent, the impugned order dated 3rd December, 2013, passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Bandra, Mumbai,   below Exhibit – 6 in Petition No.C­141 of 2012,  is quashed and set aside.  As far as second prayer of the petitioner, seeking transfer of the case is concerned, the said prayer is rejected as it is without   substance and devoid of merit. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the respondent has moved an application before the Family Court, seeking amendment to the main petition, being Petition No.C­141 of 2012, for   deletion of the reliefs sought for under the Domestic Violence Act.  Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that she will not oppose the amendment application, wherein the amendment is for deleting the reliefs sought for  under the Domestic Violence Act.   Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that the respondent be permitted to   file a fresh application seeking interim maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act….

Daughter-in-law has no rights in Shared Household

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IA Nos.291/2005 and 8444/2005 in CS (OS) No. 41/2005 Date of Hearing: 08-03-2007 Date of Decision: 02-07-2007 Smt.Shumita Didi Sandhu …..Plaintiff Through Mr. Rakesh Tikku with Mr.Brajesh Kumar Srivastava Versus Mr.Sanjay Singh Sandhu and Ors. …..Defendant…

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation