MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whether court can convict accused with the aid of Section 149 of IPC even if it has not framed specific charge U/S 149 of IPC against accused?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 408 of 2007 Decided On: 21.04.2009 Anna Reddy Sambasiva Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Hon’ble Judges/Coram: D.K. Jain and R.M. Lodha, JJ. Citation: MANU/SC/0640/2009,(2009) 12 SCC 546, AIR 2009 SC 2661. R.M. Lodha, J. 1….

When court should not entertain issue of Prejudice to accused due to his Inadequate Examination U/S 313 of CrPC?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 937, 938 and 939 of 2011 Decided On: 04.10.2019 Fainul Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: Navin Sinha and B.R. Gavai, JJ. Citation: AIR 2019 SC 4858 1. The Appellants are aggrieved by…

Whether accused can be convicted with aid of S 34 of IPC if it is not possible to convict him U/S 149 of IPC?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 701, 702, 703-704, 705-706, 707, 708 of 2012 Decided On: 06.10.2017 Birbal Choudhary Vs. State of Bihar Hon’ble Judges/Coram:A.K. Sikri and R.K. Agrawal, JJ. Citation: (2018) 12 SCC 440 1. The eleven Appellants herein, out of…

Rules under S 313 of CrPC for framing questions for examination of accused

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 263 of 2013 Decided On: 11.09.2014 Appellants: Sukhjit Singh Vs. Respondent: State of Punjab Hon’ble Judges/Coram:Dipak Misra and Arjan Kumar Sikri, JJ. 1. The present appeal, by special leave, is preferred by the Appellant assailing the judgment and order passed by…

Compensation for handcuffing and detention

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2250 OF 2011 ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) NO.1658/2010 HARDEEP SINGH APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2251 OF 2011 ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL)D NO.23364/2008 HARDEEP SINGH…

Same Lawyer can represent against clients 2nd Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION  NO.115  OF 2014 Rajiv Hiranandani     … Petitioner V/s. Namrata Zakaria … Respondent Ms.Edith Dey, for the Petitioner. Ms.T.F.Irani, for the Respondent. Both the parties are present. CORAM :  REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED  : 30th  July, 2014. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner herein, is challenging the order dated 3rd December, 2013, passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Bandra, Mumbai,   below Exhibit – 6 in Petition No.C­141 of 2012, by which  the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.50,000/­,  by way of ad­hoc interim maintenance. 3. By consent, the impugned order dated 3rd December, 2013, passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Bandra, Mumbai,   below Exhibit – 6 in Petition No.C­141 of 2012,  is quashed and set aside.  As far as second prayer of the petitioner, seeking transfer of the case is concerned, the said prayer is rejected as it is without   substance and devoid of merit. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the respondent has moved an application before the Family Court, seeking amendment to the main petition, being Petition No.C­141 of 2012, for   deletion of the reliefs sought for under the Domestic Violence Act.  Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that she will not oppose the amendment application, wherein the amendment is for deleting the reliefs sought for  under the Domestic Violence Act.   Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that the respondent be permitted to   file a fresh application seeking interim maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act….

ExParte Divorce order not binding on Criminal Court

DATED: 02.08.2010 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.SUDANTHIRAM Criminal Revision Case No.771 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 K.Senthilnathan .. Petitioner Vs. Mrs.Jaichitra .. Respondent Prayer : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order…

Copyright © 2020 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation