MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Fine for Misrepresentation or False statement

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 812 of 2002 PETITIONER:VIJAY SYAL AND ANR. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/05/2003 BENCH:SHIVARAJ V. PAT1L & ARIJ1T PASAYAT JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT 2003 Supp(1) SCR 242 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVARAJ V….

Court can declare marriage as void on ground of fraud under Section 12(1)(c)

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 2006 Parvati Devi——————————–Defendant/Appellant Versus Dharm Chandra Seth——————-Plaintiff/Respondent Hon’ble Prakash Krishna,J Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi (II),J. The above appeal has been has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the judgment and order…

Concealment of Facts / Evidence from court amounts to fraud with court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1155 of 2006 Devendra Kumar…Appellant Versus State of Uttaranchal & Ors.…Respondents J U D G M E N T Dr. B. S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned…

Distant relatives 498A quashed with Section 482 Cr.P.C

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-29612 of 2008 Date of Decision: 03.02.2012 Dalpreet Singh and others….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others…Respondents CORAM : Hon’ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Present:- Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr….

Careful when compromising in Maintenance

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11800 OF 2013 [Arising out of C.C. No. 1297 of 2012] Nagendrappa Natikar .. Petitioner Versus Neelamma .. Respondent J U D G M E N T K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J….

False Accusation, Cruelty in Divorce Explained

Kerala High Court S. Latha Kunjamma vs K. Anil Kumar on 24 March, 2008 Bench: K Joseph, Harun-Ul-Rashid JUDGMENT Harun-Ul-Rashid, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the petitioner/wife in O.P. No. 554/2006 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 7-8-2006 on the file of the…

Calling Impotent, character assassinations is Cruelty – Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.211-M of 2003 Date of decision: 27.08.2009 Jasbir Kaur ..Appellant Versus Kuljit Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present:- Mr.Arun Jain, Sr. Advocate,with Mr.S.S.Dinarpur, Advocate,for the appellant. Mr.G.S.Bhatia, Advocate,for the respondent….

Copyright © 2018 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh