MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whatsapp message without Certificate u/s 65b(4) Evidence act has no Evidentiary value

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.23220 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision.14.01.2021 Reserved on 06.01.2021 (Heard through VC) Rakesh Kumar Singla …Petitioner Vs Union of India …Respondent CORAM:HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present: Mr. R.S. Rai,…

Could prosecution against the accused under NDPS Act be vitiated if police fail to comply S 42 of NDPS Act?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1154 OF 2004 The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant V/s. 1 Suabai Narhari Babar Age about 55 years, R/o Shirpur, Tal Malshiras,Dist:- Solapur 2 Jalindar Appasaheb Dhere Age about 47 years, Occ: Advocate…

SC: Officers authorised to investigate NDPS cases are ‘police officers’ and confessional statements made to them are not admissible

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.152 OF 2013 TOFAN SINGH …Appellant Versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU …Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1750 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2214 OF 2009 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 827 OF 2010 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO….

Accused found in possession of “manufactured drug” can be tried under NDPS Act in place of Drugs and Cosmetics Act

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1512 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO. 4762 OF 2018) STATE OF PUNJAB …APPELLANT VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR …RESPONDENT WITH Criminal Appeal No. 1514 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4816…

Un-shattered testimony of official witnesses can be relied upon solely in order to prove guilt of the accused

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No.656 of 2017. Reserved on : 29.10.2018. Date of Decision : 05.11.2018. . Neer …Appellant. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan…

Petitioner granted bail in a case identical to co-accused, who was already on bail

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.28790 of 2018 Decided on: 18.07.2018 Jagat Ram….Petitioner Versus State of Punjab….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present : Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. ARVIND SINGH…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation