MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Magistrate Can’t Direct Further Investigation On Defacto Complainant’s Plea

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 478 of 2016 From the order dated 04.05.2016 of the S.D.J.M., Bhadrak passed in G.R. Case No. 1917 of 2013. Smt. Nandita Sethi @ Behera ……… Petitioner -Versus- State of Orissa & another ……… Opp. parties…

498A Quash – No Offence out of FIR

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No. 24423 of 2004: (1) Dinesh Kumar Lal, son of Mohin Chander Lal, (2) Gayatri @ Nilu, wife of Dinesh Kumar Lal, both of village Kashipur, Near Dr. B.N. Prasad, PS Town, District Samastipur Petitioners. with…

Accuser Presence is not required under 313 CrPC

Kerala High Court Bench: A Basheer Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 26/4/2005 ORDER A.K. Basheer, J. 1. Is it mandatory that the accused should be invariably present in Court to answer the questions put to him under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation