MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

While determining Maintenance, Court must consider Husband’s financial status, Changed circumstances

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 21st April, 2022 Pronounced on: 10th June, 2022 CRL. REV. P. 56/2018 JYOTI @ GAYATRI ….. Petitioner Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy (DHCLSC) and Mr. Manish Vashist, Advocates versus ROHIT SHARMA @ SANTOSH SHARMA ……..

Direction Wife to pay monthly Interim Maintenance to Estranged husband

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2527 OF 2021 Bhagyashri w/o. Jagdish Jaiswal .. Petitioner Vs. Jagdish S/o. Sajjanlala Jaiswal & Anr. .. Respondents Mr. S.S. Thombre for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Mewana for respondent No1. CORAM :…

Kerala HC: Wife paying Maintenance to able bodied Husband would promote “Idleness”

CLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENT

Interim maintenance amount reduced on account of it being ‘excessive’ owing to low income of the husband

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH ON THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.208059 OF 2017 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI RACHAYYA S/O SANGAYYA SHANKIN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS R/O MUDDEBIHAL, TALUK MUDDEBIHAL DISTRICT:…

Section 19/24 of the Hindu Marriage Act dismissed for concealing true income

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Pronounced On: 4th July 2018 MAT.APP.(F.C) 143/2018 NEETU BARUA …..Appellant Through: Mr. Zartab Anwar , Advocate. versus MANAS BARUA …..Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA…

Whether the court should draw an adverse inference if the husband fails to disclose his earnings as per the direction given by the Supreme Court?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4014 OF 2019 Arpana Vijay Manore Vs Dr. Vijay Tukaram Manore, CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J. JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 09.12.2020 Heard. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable forthwith. With…

Frivolous HMA 24 Petition under Article 227 dismissed with cost

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 67/2014 16th July , 2014 MRS. PURNIMA LAL ……Petitioner Through: Ms. Vasundhra Singh, Advocate. VERSUS SHRI UDIT AGRAWAL, IAS …… Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harish Pandey, Advocate. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE…

No Maintenance on basis of speculation of Income of Husband

Madhya Pradesh High Court Raghubir Yadav vs Smt. Purnima Kharga (Yadav) Civil Revision No. 2631 Of 1998 on 18 September, 2000 Equivalent citations: II (2001) DMC 79 Bench: D Misra ORDER Dipak Misra, J. 1. Celluloid personalities, when become protagonists in a legal battle before…

Merely being accused of Criminal case, cannot deny enrollment as advocate

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh WP 11350/2018 BRAJ MOHAN MAHAJAN Vs BAR COUNCIL OF STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS Gwalior, dated : 11.09.2018 Shri Braj Mohan Mahajan, petitioner in person. Shri J.P. Mishra, Advocate for the respondents. The writ and supervisory jurisdiction of…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation