MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

PROCEDURE FOR LD.ADVOCATE/ PARTY-IN-PERSON FOR HEARING OF MATTERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING BEFORE THE HON’BLE JUDGE IN-CHAMBERS

PROCEDURE FOR PARTY-INPERSON AND THE REGISTRY FOR HEARING OF MATTERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING

Child Custody – Video Call veryday for 30 minutes

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAT.APP.(F.C.) 126/2019 DR. GEETANJALI AGGARWAL ….. Appellant Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate. versus DR. MANOJ AGGARWAL ….. Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D…

Provided unhindered access to both Parents

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1466/2020 & CRL.M.A. 5872/2020 SIRISHA DINAVAHI BANSAL ….. Appellant Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Nisha Narayanan, Advocates. versus RAJIV BANSAL ….. Respondents Through: Ms. Bobby Aanand and Mr. S.Anand, Advocates. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE…

SC Direct case back to FC for Parents Having Visitation Rights To Maintain Contact With Children Via Electronic Means

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.10994/2020 VENKATESH SRINIVASA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s) Date : 30­04­2020 This petition was called…

Video Conferencing with Facetime, Whatsapp, Skype Allowed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR 182-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.05.2018 Sucha Singh …..Petitioner versus Ajmer Singh and another……Respondents CR 272-2017 (O&M) Sucha Singh …..Petitioner versus Ajmer Singh and another……Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh Present: Mr.Paramjit Batta, Advocate…

Sample Application to Exempt from Personal Presence or trial with Video Conferencing

IN THE COURT OF { name of judge} In the matter of:- STATE {Name of State} VERSUS {Husband’s name} & Anr./ Othrs. ..ACCUSED FIR NO. XX/ XXXX PS: {Name of Police Station} U/ S 498A/ 406/ {any other}/34 IPC APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLICANTS XXXXXXXXXXX,…

Video conferencing allowed instead Transferring Divorce Petition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1389 OF 2017 T. RAJALAXMI PETITIONER(S) VERSUS G. MANIKANDA PRABHU RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R In view of the order of this Court dated 9th March, 2017 in T.P.(C)No.1912 of 2014, titled…

Transfer Petition in matrimonial case and video conferencing

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1278 of 2016 SANTHINI PETITIONER(S) VERSUS VIJAYA VENKETESH RESPONDENT(S) WITH TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 422 OF 2017 O R D E R 1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for transfer…

Basic Principles to be followed to resolve conflict between two fundamental rights

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 132 OF 2016 Asha Ranjan Vs State of Bihar Ors. Dated:FEBRUARY 15, 2017. Citation: AIR 2017 SC 1079. Regard being had to the similitude of prayers and considering the commonality of issues…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2020 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation