Neetu vs State & Anr on 12 July, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1849 / 2017
Neetu Widow of Late Shri Kaluram, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste
Harijan, Resident of Nawal Nagar, Ratanada, Jodhpur Presently
Residing At Madhobagh, Harijan Basti, Jalori Gate, Jodhpur.

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. State of Rajasthan

2. Arun Son of Shri Roshan Lal Barasa, By Caste Valmiki (Harijan),
Resident of Digari Fanta, Ajmer Road, Jodhpur.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.D.K.Gaur
For Respondent(s) : Mr.V.S.Rajpurohit PP for the State.

Mr.S.S.Nirban
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/07/2017

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been preferred for quashing of the impugned FIR No.128

dated 11.04.2017 registered at Police Station, Ratanada, District

Jodhpur East for the offences under Sections 498A and 304B IPC

as well as entire proceedings initiated thereunder qua the present

petitioner or in the alternative, the investigating agency be

directed to conduct fair and impartial investigation in the matter.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the version of the petitioner is required to be kept

before the investigating authority, so as to ensure fair and

impartial investigation in the matter.

(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1849/2017]

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the

petitioner submits his version before the concerned investigating

authority within a period of seven days from today, then the same

shall be considered appropriately strictly in accordance with law.

4. On such assurance given by the learned Public

Prosecutor, this Court disposes of the present misc. petition with

READ  Kanabhai Shardulbhai Pamak vs State Of Gujarat on 29 June, 2017

the direction to the concerned investigating authority to consider

the version of the petitioner, if submitted by him within a period of

seven days from today, appropriately strictly in accordance with

law before completion of the investigation. In case, the petitioner

is required to be arrested, then he shall be given fifteen days’

prior notice before making such arrest.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

Skant/-

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *