IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4804 of 2017
Krishna Yadav @ Sikandar Jee, s/o late Vishwanath Yadav, r/o village
Kalapahar, PO Latheya, PS Chhattarpur, Distt. Palamau
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Surendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P.
05/20.07.2017
The petitioner has failed to disclose his criminal
antecedent, as ordered vide order dated 04.07.2017.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this application.
The instant bail application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5141 of 2017
Anand Kumar Mishra … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. P. P. N. Roy, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P.
04/20.07.2017 Let name of Mr. K. P. Deo, appear in the cause list as
counsel for C.B.I.
Post the matter on 04.08.2017.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4751 of 2017
Jetha Kachhap … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Abhinesh Kumar, A.P.P.
05/20.07.2017 On the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner
for complying with order dated 04.07.2017, post this matter along
with B.A. No. 3237 of 2017 on 11.08.2017 in supplementary cause
list.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4119 of 2017
Pappu Ansari @ Mobin Ansari … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
With
B.A. No. 4259 of 2017
Sunil Mochi @ Sunil Ram @ Sunil Kr. Ram … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Raju Hembrom Advocate
[in B.A. No. 4119 of 2017]
Mr. K. S. Nanda, Advocate
[in B.A. No. 4259 of 2017]
For the State : A.P.P.
05/20.07.2017 On the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners,
post these matters on 04.08.2017 in the supplementary cause list.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4392 of 2017
Billu Oraon @ Raj Kumar Oraon … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. A. K. Chaturvedi, Advocate
For the State : A.P.P.
04/20.07.2017 On the request of the learned A.P.P. for filing an affidavit in the
matter, post the matter on 28.07.2017 in the supplementary cause
list.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4500 of 2017
Raj Kumari Devi … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. S. K. Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State : A.P.P.
04/20.07.2017 On the request made on behalf of the learned A.P.P., post
the matter after two weeks.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4393 of 2017
Binod Kumar Chaturbedi … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Nehru Mahto, A.P.P.
05/20.07.2017 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to carry out corrections in the bail application.
Permission is granted.
The learned A.P.P. is seeking an adjournment for filing an
affidavit in the matter.
Post the matter on 03.08.2017.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
xxx … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners : Mr., Advocate
For the State : Mr. , A.P.P.
xx/20.07.2017
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5385 of 2017
Abhay Ghosh @ Abhoy Ghosh, son of Sunil @ Mochiram Ghosh,
resident of Mohindnagar, PO and PS Nala, Dist. Jamtara
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate
For the State : Ms. Sadhna Kumar, A.P.P.
03/20.07.2017 Additional affidavit filed by the petitioner is taken on
record.
Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, the learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that on identical allegation the petitioner was
implicated in Nala P.S. Case No. 05 of 2017 in which he has been
granted anticipatory bail vide A.B.A. No. 1635 of 2017. The
petitioner was a student in Nala Inter College Nala, (Gopalpur),
Jamtara from where he has completed Intermediate in Science. The
petitioner is in custody since 16.05.2017 and chargesheet has
already been submitted in this case.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Nala P.S. Case
No. 32 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No. 339 of 2017.
The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of this
order be sent to the trial Court through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4403 of 2017
1. Bhusan Das
2. Mahesh Das
Both s/o of Chandan Das, r/o village Godhar Das Basti, PO
+PS Kenduadih, Dist. Dhanbad
… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, A.P.P.
04/20.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
In Kenduadih P.S. Case No. 141 of 2016 in which one of
the allegations was for committing offence under Section 354 I.P.C.
and under Section 8 of POCSO Act, now chargesheet has been filed
for offences under Sections 341, 323, 452, 504 and 506/34 I.P.C.
The petitioners are in judicial custody since 02.05.2017.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on
each one furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten
Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge1stcumSpecial
Judge, Dhanbad, in connection with Kenduadih P.S. Case No. 141 of
2016 corresponding to G.R. No. 4795 of 2016, with the condition
that the petitioners shall appear before the trial Court regularly.
The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of this
order be sent to the trial Court through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xxx of xxx
xxxxxxxxx … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. , Advocate
For the State : Mr. , A.P.P.
xx/20.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
the petitioner, abovenamed, if he is not wanted in any other case, is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial
CommissionerVI, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.
253 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 5992 of 2011, with the
conditions that once released on bail he shall remain physically
present on each and every date during the trial, but for special
circumstances and shall not change his residence without prior
permission of the Court.
The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of this
order be sent to the trial Court through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xxx of xxx
xxxxxxxxx … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. , Advocate
For the State : Mr. , A.P.P.
xx/20.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
the petitioner, abovenamed, if he is not wanted in any other case, is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial
CommissionerVI, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.
253 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 5992 of 2011, with the
conditions that once released on bail he shall remain physically
present on each and every date during the trial, but for special
circumstances and shall not change his residence without prior
permission of the Court.
The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of this
order be sent to the trial Court through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xxx of xxx
xxxxxxxxx … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. , Advocate
For the State : Mr. , A.P.P.
xx/20.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
the petitioner, abovenamed, if he is not wanted in any other case, is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial
CommissionerVI, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.
253 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 5992 of 2011, with the
conditions that once released on bail he shall remain physically
present on each and every date during the trial, but for special
circumstances and shall not change his residence without prior
permission of the Court.
The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of this
order be sent to the trial Court through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xxx of xxx
xxxxxxxxx … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. , Advocate
For the State : Mr. , A.P.P.
xx/20.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
the petitioner, abovenamed, if he is not wanted in any other case, is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial
CommissionerVI, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No.
253 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 5992 of 2011, with the
conditions that once released on bail he shall remain physically
present on each and every date during the trial, but for special
circumstances and shall not change his residence without prior
permission of the Court.
The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of this
order be sent to the trial Court through FAX.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4410 of 2017
Sahuran Karmali, s/o Gopal Karmali, r/o village Sadma, PO Sadma,
PS Ormanjhi, Distt Ranchi … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P.
04/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
Contending that only on the basis of the disclosure
statement of Ashok Baitha name of the petitioner has surfaced, the
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no legally
admissible evidence against the petitioner which would primafacie
indicate involvement of the petitioner in the crime. It is contended
that initially name of the said Ashok Baitha transpired in the
confessional statement of Kashi Nath Baitha who has failed to
disclose the complicity of the petitioner in the crime.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Casediary has been received in the Court and a
counteraffidavit has been filed.
To the contention that name of the petitioner has been
disclosed by the coaccused Ashok Baitha, suffice would be to
indicate that this cannot be an infirmity in the prosecution case
which would throw considerable doubt on the petitioner’s
involvement in the case. After disclosure of the name of the
petitioner by the coaccused namely, Ashok Baitha the investigation
in the case proceeded against him and the police collected materials.
The call detail reports and the location of the mobile phones connect
the accused persons with commission of crime. The petitioner’s
involvement in the crime appears from the materials collected during
investigation. May be, motorcycle is not the crime weapon, allegation
is that it has been used in the crime, and it was recovered from the
house of the petitioner.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. , Advocate
For the State : Mr., A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. , Advocate
For the State : Mr. , A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jawed Sul tan, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Gouri S. Prasad, A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jawed Sul tan, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Gouri S. Prasad, A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jawed Sul tan, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Gouri S. Prasad, A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jawed Sul tan, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Gouri S. Prasad, A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. xx of xx
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jawed Sul tan, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Gouri S. Prasad, A.P.P.
xx/19.07.2017 Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and
perused the documents on record.
The learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this
application is rejected.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
