SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pardeep vs State Of Haryana on 9 August, 2017

301 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. M- No. 28348 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : August 09, 2017

Pardeep …..Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ….Respondent

CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present: Mr. B.S. Bairagi, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana.

***

LISA GILL, J.

The petitioner prays for bail pending trial in FIR No. 797 dated

18.07.2016 registered under Sections 376, 342, 498A, 506, 120B IPC at

Police Station Chandni Bagh, District Panipat.

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in

this matter due to certain misunderstandings, which developed between the

complainant and other family members. Moreover, the complainant/victim

(PW1) and her real sister (PW2) have not supported the prosecution version

while deposing before the learned trial Court on 15.07.2017. Copies of the

statements of PW1 and PW2 are attached with this petition as Annexures

P-1 and P-2. Both the said witnesses have been declared hostile. It is, thus,

prayed that this petition be allowed.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

1 of 2
12-08-2017 11:39:34 :::
Criminal Misc. M- No. 28348 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State is unable to deny the fact that the

complainant/victim as well as her sister have not supported the prosecution

version and they have been declared hostile. It is verified that the petitioner

is not involved in any other criminal case. He is in custody since

18.07.2016. Trial, in this case, is not likely to conclude in the near future.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is

likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from

deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

No useful purpose shall be served by keeping the petitioner

incarcerated any longer. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted

above but without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is

considered just and expedient to allow this petition.

Consequently, the petitioner be released on bail pending trial

subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety bonds to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

It is reiterated that none of the observations made herein above

are a reflection on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on the

trial.

(Lisa Gill)
August 09, 2017 Judge
rts

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
12-08-2017 11:39:35 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please CLICK HERE to read Group Rules, If You agree then JOIN HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DVACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA24, 125 CrPc, 307, 313, 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509 etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh