MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

DV quashed for all 7 kin of Husband

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 27.03.2018
Reserved on : 02.02.2018
Delivered on : 27.03.2018

CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13230 of 2017

and

CRL.M.P(MD).Nos.8953 8954 of 2017

1.Kannan
2.Shanmugathai
3.Sivagami @ Kuttiammal
4.Kalaiselvi
5.Srinivasan
6.Thirupathi
7.Selvaraj … Petitioners/Respondents 1 to 7

-Vs-

Vimala … Respondent/ Complainant

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed underneath Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for a whole annals regarding to a petition filed underneath a Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in D.V.O.P.No.2 of 2017 on a record of a District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Peraiyur and stifle a same as illegal.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Karunanidhi
For Respondent : Mr.A.Govindaraj

:ORDER

This petition has been filed to stifle a record in D.V.O.P.No.2 of 2017 on a record of a District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur.

2.The schooled warn for a petitioners has submitted that a initial postulant is a father of a respondent herein, second postulant is a mom and other petitioners are sister and brothers of a initial petitioner. He serve submitted that a matrimony between a initial postulant and a respondent was solemnized on 12.09.2010 and thereafter, they led a marital life usually during Ekattuthangal, Chennai, since a initial postulant was operative during Chennai. He serve submitted that during no indicate of time a respondent lived with a petitioners 2 to 7 in a common domicile and therefore, a supplies of Domestic Violence Act will not attract.

3.The schooled warn for a respondent has submitted that all a petitioners go to a same family and they are vital as a corner family. He serve submitted that a petitioners 1 to 7 have conspired and tormented a respondent by perfectionist dowry and also driven out a respondent from a matrimonial home and hence, a supplies of Domestic Violence Act would attract opposite all a petitioners herein.

See also  LAW RELATING TO ARREST

4.The respondent herein has filed an focus underneath Section 12 of a Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (herein after referred as ‘the Act’), seeking certain reliefs underneath a aforesaid Act. The condition fashion for filing focus underneath a Act is that a applicant/aggrieved chairman should have lived or vital in a domestic attribute with a respondent. As per Section 2(f) of a Act, domestic attribute means ?a attribute between dual persons, who live or have, during any indicate of time, lived together in a common household, when they are associated by consanguinity, marriage, or by a attribute in a inlet of marriage, adoption or are family members vital together as a corner family;?

5.In this case, a examination of a focus filed by a respondent underneath Section 12 of a DV Act shows that a respondent herein has certified that 10 days after a matrimony a initial postulant herein and herself have shifted their chateau to Ekattuthangal, Chennai since a initial postulant herein was operative during Chennai. So, it is transparent that a respondent herein has not lived together or vital with a petitioners 2 to 7 in a domestic attribute in a common household. Therefore, a move opposite a petitioners 2 to 7 in D.V.O.P.No.2 of 2017 on a record of a District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, has to be quashed. In so distant as a initial postulant is concerned, who is being a father he has not denied a averments that he lived along with a respondent during Ekattuthangal, Chennai, and as such, prima facie, a supplies of a Act would attract opposite him and therefore, a record opposite him can't be quashed.

6.In a result, this Criminal Original Petition is partly allowed. In sofar as a petitioners 2 to 7 are concerned, a record in D.V.O.P.No.2 of 2017 on a record of a District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, is quashed. In sofar as a initial postulant is concerned, this petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

See also  Second marriage,Section 482, S.498-A Quash

To The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Peraiyur.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Matrimonial Disputes : Prosecute the complainant If allegations are found to be false
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation