MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Section 160 Cr.P.C. is not applicable to an accused


Crl. M.A. No.13547/2010 in W.P. (Crl.) No.847/2010

NEELAM SIBAL ….. Petitioner
Through: Ms.Manisha Bhandari and Mr.Omkar Shrivastava, Advs.
STATE ….. Respondent
Through: Ms. P.Mallikarjune, Adv. for Mr.Saleem Ahmed, ASC for State.



While granting interim protection vide order dated 4th June, 2010, it was directed that the petitioner, who is applicant herein, would co-operate with the investigation and join the same.

On the next date of hearing, it was alleged by the State that the petitioner is not joining investigation. With the consent of the counsel for the petitioner, order dated 27th July, 2010 was passed that she should appear before the Investigating Officer on 6th August, 2010 at 12.00 Noon. The petitioner did not appear before the Investigating Officer on 6th August, 2010 and the present application has been filed on or about 10th August, 2010, stating, inter alia that the Investigating Officer should interrogate the petitioner at Mumbai. Reliance is placed on Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the judgment of the Supreme Court in Nandini Satpathy Vs. P.L. Dani and Another, AIR 1978 Supreme Court 1025. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly pointed out that in a subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in State represented by Inspector of Police and Others Vs. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate, AIR 2004 SC 2282, it has been held that Section 160 Cr.P.C. is not applicable to an accused.

In the present case the order dated 27th July, 2010 should have been complied with. It was directed that the petitioner should come to Delhi for interrogation. Counsel for the petitioner had consented to the said direction. I am inclined to withdraw the interim protection for failure of the petitioner to comply with the said order. However, one last opportunity is granted to the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer on 16th August, 2010 at 12.00 Noon. The application is disposed of.

See also  Keeping a criminal case pending is violation of rights

AUGUST 11, 2010

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.


CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Whether appellate court must suspend the sentence of the convict as a matter of course?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation