Basic principles to be followed by court while drawing adverse inference against a partyCLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENT /docs/1374-2008Posted in JudgmentsPost navigationPrevious Previous post: Evidence of a related witness cannot be discarded; FIR is not an encyclopediaNext Next post: Sample Petition to recall the Complainant again for cross-examinationRelated PostsSame Evidence that led to In-Laws’ acquittal – Cruelty FIR against husband QuashedKerala HC: Court can not draw presumption of legitimacy of a child under Sec. 112 of Evidence Act unless the marriage of his parents is declared validIPC 498A Quash – The term ‘cruelty’ cannot be established without specific instancesLeave a ReplyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website
Kerala HC: Court can not draw presumption of legitimacy of a child under Sec. 112 of Evidence Act unless the marriage of his parents is declared valid