MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Anticipatory bail in Section 498a IPC and IPC 406 Case

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment delivered on: 01.05.2018
BAIL APPLN. 1438/2017

AMARDEEP MALHOTRA ….. Petitioner

versus

STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI ….. Respondent

Advocates who seemed in this case:
For a Petitioner : Mr. Sarthak Maggon, Adv.
For a Respondent : Mr. Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for a State with SI Manju Mr. Anupam Dwivedi, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.

CORAM:HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

01.05.2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Learned counsels for a postulant as good as warn for complainant surprise that a allotment could not be arrived during before a mediator. The matter is taken on record.

2. Learned Addl. PP informs that a chargesheet has been #filed and on 12.04.2018 #cognizance has already been taken. Learned Addl. PP serve informs that a postulant did join a review as and when he was destined to do so.

3. The postulant seeks anticipatory #bail in box FIR No. 517/2016 underneath Sections 498A/406/34 of a IPC Police Station Janak Puri, New Delhi.

4. In a eventuality of arrest, a #petitioner shall be #released on bail by a impediment officer/IO/SHO endangered theme to petitioner’s furnishing a bail #bond in a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one #surety of a like volume to a compensation of a impediment officer/IO/SHO concerned.

5. Order Dasti underneath signatures of a Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
MAY 01, 2018

See also  SC: Right to Default Bail, Even if charge sheet seeking extension of time is subsequently filed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, though No Lawyer will give we Advice like We do

Please review Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You determine afterwards Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We hoop Women Centric inequitable laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  U/S 127 of CrPc family court can grant lumpsum amount towards residential accomodation?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation