Delay in lodging complaint results in exaggerationState Of Andhra Pradesh vs M. Madhusudhan Rao (498A)Posted in JudgmentsPost navigationPrevious Previous post: THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955Next Next post: No Parallel 125 CrPc and DVA for MaintennaceRelated PostsSC: Spouse cannot withdraw consent for mutual divorce after agreeing for it in settlement of claimsPolice should record statements, Preserve videos of amicable settlements in criminal casesKerala HC: Court can not draw presumption of legitimacy of a child under Sec. 112 of Evidence Act unless the marriage of his parents is declared validLeave a ReplyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website
Kerala HC: Court can not draw presumption of legitimacy of a child under Sec. 112 of Evidence Act unless the marriage of his parents is declared valid