SC: Even if disclosure statement made by Accused is not admissible U/S 27 of Evidence Act but it is relevant U/S 8 of evidence Act as his conductCLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENTPosted in JudgmentsPost navigationPrevious Previous post: What are exceptions to the rule that burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the Accused ?Next Next post: Bombay HC guidelines regarding video recording of all proceeding under SC & ST (Atrocities Act) including bail applicationRelated PostsSame Evidence that led to In-Laws’ acquittal – Cruelty FIR against husband QuashedChild’s future not safe with women who fails in “pious duties” towards husbandNo maintenance to educated wife in HMALeave a ReplyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name * Email * Website