MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

Father contact with his son via video-conference

Calcutta High Court

17.08.2020

C.O. 1159 of 2020 with CAN 4782 of 2020
(via video conference)

Dipankar Dey
Versus
Debasree De & Ors.

Ms. Sananda Ganguli ….for the petitioner.
Mr. S. Ray,
Mr. A. K. Jha ….for the respondent no.1.

The instant revisional application has been filed in view of the pendency of an application before the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court – III, Barasat, 24-Parganas (North).

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he wishes to contact his son, Debarshi De over electronic media including video call on regular basis. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the custody of the son, Debarshi De is with his mother-the opposite party no.1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.1 submits that he has no objection if the petitioner-father is permitted to establish contact with his son via video-conference or through electronic media including video calls thrice a week at the convenience of the mother and the son.

In view of the submission made on behalf the opposite party no.1, C.O. 1159 of 2020 along with CAN 4782 of 2020 stands disposed of.

The petitioner is granted liberty to contact his son via video conference or through electronic media including video calls thrice a week at the convenience of the son and his mother.

All other issues are left open to be decided before the learned Trial Court at the state of proceedings.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)

READ  Don't deny visitation to Father

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

READ  Custody to Father
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation