IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR NO.4813 OF 2009 (OM)

DECIDED ON : 25.08.2009

Raman Ahuja @ Banti …Petitioner

versus

Vandana …Respondent

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present : Mr. Karan Vir Nanda,

Advocate for a petitioner.

AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)

This petition has been filed opposite a endowment of upkeep pendente lite of Rs.3,000/- per month.

The usually request done by a schooled warn for a postulant is that a postulant is already profitable upkeep underneath Section 125 Cr.PC and Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

So, a postulant should not have to compensate upkeep on eccentric accounts.

In fact what a schooled warn for a postulant is praying for is unequivocally a law.

Learned warn serve relied on a visualisation of Hon’ble Supreme Court patrician as Sudeep Chaudhary contra Radha Chaudhary 1999 AIR (SC) 536.

Consequently, this petition is discharged with a construction that a volume awarded by a impugned sequence would be set off opposite a upkeep being paid by a postulant to a respondent underneath other proceedings.

August 25, 2009 (AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE