MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Register to Download

SC: Court hearing first appeal in criminal matter is required to form its own Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.688 OF 2020

CHANDRABHAN SINGH

VS.

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Dated: October 16, 2020.

Leave granted.

None has appeared for the respondent-State even though service has been effected on the State and the Standing Counsel. Learned counsel appeared for the complainant and has assisted us.

Notice was issued on a limited aspect i.e. that the impugned order is only a recitation of the evidence without appreciation of the same for purposes of reaffirming conviction in appeal.

We would like to say that the First Appeal in criminal matter requires the court to form his opinion on the basis of the evidence on record and the opinion of the Trial Court. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the facts have been set out followed by what each witness has deposed. Thereafter, all that is stated is as under:

“In view of the above, we find that the
prosecution has been successful in proving guilt of
the accused-appellant, by adducing cogent and
reliable evidence, beyond all reasonable doubt.
Hence, from the circumstances brought on record
by the prosecution, the guilt of the accused appellant
with regard to the commission of crime inquestion
stands duly established.”

The aforesaid is followed by dismissal of the appeal.

We are of the view that this can hardly meet the requirements of law for considering the First Appeal in criminal matters and thus, have no option but to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back for consideration by the High Court on merits as a First Appeal in a Section 302 case of the I.P.C. in accordance with law.

See also  Whether one member of joint family can take plea of adverse possession against another member?

The appeal is accordingly allowed leaving parties to bear their own costs.

The Nominal Roll shows the appellant has been in actual custody for about eight and a half years. In view of the aforesaid and in view of the facts set out in the order aforesaid, we grant bail to the appellant on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

[SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]
[DINESH MAHESHWARI]
[HRISHIKESH ROY]
New Delhi;
October 16, 2020.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

See also  Whether a party can produce document in cross examination even if it was not produced along with written statement?
MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation