MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Reinvestigate petition dismissed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-38495 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 02, 2021 Kamlesh Kumari …Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab and others … Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present : Mr. K….

Demanding money to buy Household articles not Dowry

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 23.07.2019 DELIVERED ON: 06.08.2019 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH Crl.A. No.395 of 2018 & Crl.M.P. No.6549 of 2019 Sakthivel Appellant/A1 vs. State, D.S.P. Namakkal Sub Division (Sendamangalam P.S. Cr. No.665/2012 Namakkal District Respondent…

498A be made Bailable and Compoundable

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. R 462/2002 19.05.2003 DATE OF DECISION: May 19, 2003 Savitri Devi ………….Petitioner. Through Mr. H C Mittal,Adv. Versus Ramesh Chand and Ors. …………Respondents Through Mr. R P Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.D. KAPOOR…

Ordinary petulance and discord in matrimonial life is not Cruelty, 498A or Abetment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 16, 2014 CRL.A. 611/1999 MAHAVIR KUMAR & ORS. ….. Appellants Through: Mr.K.B. Andley, Sr. Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav and Mr.Lokesh Chandra, Advocates. versus STATE ….. Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP CORAM: HON’BLE MR….

Appellants are acquitted in 304B

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-01-2007 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.REGUPATHI Pukkraj v. State – Crl.A.No.859 of 2000 [2007] RD-TN 306 (25 January 2007) 1.Pukkraj 2.Kamalabai 3.Prakash 4.Kishore .. Appellants. Versus State rep. By Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pulianthope Range,…

304-B set aside in 498A IPC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR JUDGMENT IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No.388/2002 SURESH RAWAT v STATE – CRLA Case No. 388 of 2002 [2007] RD-RJ 2538 (8 May 2007) Suresh Rawat S/o Ganga Ram Rawat Versus State of Rajasthan Date…

304B dismissed in 498A

NALLAM VEERA STAYANANDAM & ORS V. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P [2004] RD-SC 114 (24 February 2004) N Santosh Hegde & B P Singh. SANTOSH HEGDE, J. The appellants before us were charged of offences punishable under section 304B and 498A IPC and…


Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation