MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Challenging the legality of the order – Name Removal

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 420 of 2006 PETITIONER:Minu Kumari and Anr. RESPONDENT:The State of Bihar and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/04/2006 BENCH:ARIJIT PASAYAT S.H. KAPADIA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of (SLP (Crl.) No. 4607 of…

Criminal case compounded as the offence alleged was not ‘stricto sensu’ against the State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA   Cr. Revision No. 173 of 2009. Date of decision: 15th May, 2018. Sunit Singh & anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. ……Respondent Coram :The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr….

Anticipatory bail cannot be denied on sole grounds that a serious charge is leveled against accused

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C.1829/2017 Judgement reserved on:3rd November,2017 Judgement pronounced on: 20th November,2017 SHIVALI SHARMA ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Shalinder Dhaiya, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR …. Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh kumar, APP with…

Vague allegations of Dowry demand, 304B and 498a quash

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AJAY KUMAR KUHAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE­ 02 : SE : SAKET COURT : ND IN RE:           ID No. DLSE01­000148­2013 SC No. 1388/16 FIR No.551/13 PS Govindpuri State Versus (1) Mithun S/o Shri Nokhai (2) Nokhai S/o Shri Tirath Nishad (3) Sushila Devi W/o Shri Nokhai All R/o RZ­3121, Gali No. 35,Tughlakabad Extension,New Delhi. Date of Institution     :      27.11.2013 Date of arguments    : 08.11.2017 Date of judgment                 :      27.11.2017 JUDGMENT 1.     The accused have been put to trial for the offences u/s 498­ A IPC read with section 34 IPC; 302 IPC read with 34 IPC, 304­B IPC read with 34 IPC and section 406 IPC read with section 34 IPC. 2.   The facts of the case, in brief, are that on 04.08.2013, DD No.   6A   was   noted   in   the…

8 months unexplained delay in lodging  complaint, 498a dismissed.

Delhi High Court Jagdish Chand vs The State And Ors. on 26 August, 1994 Equivalent citations: 1995 CriLJ 2253, 1994 (31) DRJ 78 Bench: D Bhandari JUDGMENT Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 25th October, 1990. By…

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2018 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh