MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Juvenile Justice board should not reject bail application of juvenile by mechanically reproducing provisions of Juvenile Justice Act

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRR-992- 2020 Date of Decision : July 13, 2020 Ashish Masih @ Ashu Vs State of Punjab CORAM : MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR The petitioner, a minor aged 17 years, is represented by his father….

498A Quash – Section 498A Is A Weapon Rather Than Shield For Disgruntled Wives

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.13517 of 2018 Date of Decision:15.05.2020 Amarjit Kaur and others ….Petitioners versus Jaswinder Kaur and another ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present: Mr. Bhrigu Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the…

Section 340 read with Section 195 of Cr.P.C for deliberately filing false complaint

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.S-2698-SB of 2014(O&M) Date of decision: 23.02.2015 Capt. Parveen Vij..Appellant versus State of Punjab and others….Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh Present: Mr. P.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate for the appellant Mr.Vivek Rattan, Advocate for respondent Nos.2…

IPC 498A case against three members of husband’s family quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 966 OF 2016 1. Mrs. Khurshid Akbar Shaikh Aged 46 years, Occ : Service, R/o. 255/10115, Alankar CHS Kannanwar Nagar­1, Vikhroli,Mumbai – 400 083 2. Mrs.Mehrun Bilal Shaikh Age : 48…

Amicable settlement Section 498A IPC quashed with Section 482 Cr.P.C

Allahabad High Court A.F.R. Court No. – 70 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 27720 of 2019 Applicant :- Alok Jaiswal And Anr Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Manvendra Nath Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manish…

Cancellation of bail in POCSO Act.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELH CRL.M.C. 2372/2015 JAISHREE                                           ….. Petitioner versus STATE, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ANR.                ….. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J. (Oral) Instant petition underneath Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been elite by a postulant /…

Prima facie improbable – Different dowry articles to different people

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (i) CRM No.M-11705 of 2013 (OM) Baljit Singh and another…Petitioners VERSUS Karamjit Kaur…Respondent (ii) CRM No.M-15382 of 2013 (OM) Balwinder Kaur @ Davinder Kaur…Petitioner VERSUS Karamjit Kaur…Respondent Date of Decision: October 10, 2014 CORAM: HON’BLE…

Assets to be considered while deciding Maintenance.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M- 32351 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 23, 2018 Eshan Joshi…Petitioner Versus Suman…Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Present:- Mr. Hemant Bassi, Advocate with Mr. Kewal Singh,…

Being criminally charged under another case, not a hindrance in providing bail

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.10357 of 2018 Date of Decision: 01.05.2018 Anil @ Khadda @ Maharaj……Petitioner Vs State of Haryana…..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH Present:Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Saini, D.A.G.,…

Findings on past record is necessary before branding a person as habitual criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.541 OF 2018 Rauf Khan Wahab Khan Patel Age : 42 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o Near Renukamata Kaman, Beed Bye-Pass Road,Satara Parisar, Aurangabad. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra RESPONDENT…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2020 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation