MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Voluntarily incapacitates from earning is not entitled to claim maintenance

Rajasthan High Court Govind Singh vs Smt. Vidya on 21 April, 1999 Bench: A Singh JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order dated 30-1-1999 whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage…

498A, Hidding facts, Marriage null and void

Madras High Court DATED : 21. 11 .2011 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K. MOHAN RAM and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE G.M. AKBAR ALI C.M.A.No.1305 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 V.D. Grahalakshmi … Appellant vs T. Prashanth … Respondent Appeal filed under Sec.19 of the Family…

No Divorce for own misdeeds

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1957 OF 2006 Neelam Kumar … Appellant Versus Dayarani … Respondent JUDGMENT AFTAB ALAM, J. 1. This appeal, by the husband, is filed against the judgment and order dated September 14, 2005 passed by…

Need Proofs to say Impotency of Husband

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No. 969 of 2010 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI RAJENDRA RATILAL DALAL – Appellant(s) Versus DHARMISTHABEN WD/O REJENDRA R DALAL & D/O BABULAL KAMDAR – Defendant(s) Appearance…

AMENDMENT – Divorce on ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage

AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. XLI of 2010 THE MARRIAGE LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 A BILL further to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-first Year of the Republic…

1 Year Seperation before filling Section 13(B) and Waiver

Delhi High Court * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM (MAIN) NO.6/2010 Date of Decision: January 07, 2010 MS. URVASHI SIBAL & ANR. ..Petitioners Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Adv. with Ms. Prerna Mehta, Adv.,Mr. V.Vats, Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT…

Conditions for maintenance to Pay

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SECTION 13(1)(I)(A) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT CM(M) No.367/2007 RESERVED ON : 02-04-2007 DATE OF DECISION: 17-04-2007 Alok Kumar Jain ……. Petitioner through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Adv. VERSUS Purnima Jain…

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh