—
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Penal Code vs In Re : Madhusudan Das on 19 February, 2024
Author: Debangsu Basak
Bench: Debangsu Basak
19.02.2024
21
Ct. No. 29
S.D.
REJECTED
C.R.M.(A) 527 of 2024
In Re:- In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under
Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection
with Pingla Police Station Case No. 262 of 2023 dated
18.10.2023 under Section
498A/323/325/326/307/354/379/427/34 of the Indian
Penal Code.
And
In Re : Madhusudan Das
…… petitioner
Md. Sabir Ahmed
Ms. Suman Biswas
…for the petitioner
Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta
…for the State
The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits
that, the police complaint was lodged 28 years after marriage.
Petitioner was falsely implicated due to political affiliation.
Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the
attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary.
We find from the materials in the case diary that the
sister of the defacto-complainant suffered fracture injuries. She
was hospitalized for 7 days.
There are matrimonial issues between the sister of the
defacto-complainant and the petitioner before us, who is her
husband.
Petitioner before us stands implicated in the incident of
assault resulting in the fracture suffered by such victim.
2
Materials also suggest physical and mental torture.
In such circumstances, we are unable to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner and the prayer for anticipatory
bail is rejected.
The application being CRM (A) 527 of 2024 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)