SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Balendra Sanivada vs State Of Karnataka on 21 December, 2023

-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:46741
CRL.P No. 13247 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13247 OF 2023

BETWEEN:
BALENDRA SANIVADA
S/O S. VENKATESHWAR RAO
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/A NO.508, 2ND FLOOR
ANJANADRI NAGAR, B BLOCK
ARUNA ABODE HEIGHTS
DAMMAIGUDDA, HYDERABAD
TALANGANA – 500 083
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI: ANANDA .K.V., ADVOCATE)

Digitally AND:
signed by
NANDINI MS STATE OF KARNATAKA
Location: REP BY EAST ZONE
HIGH COURT
OF WOMEN POLICE STATION
KARNATAKA BENGALURU
THROUGH THE O/O
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU – 01
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI: JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438
CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE
EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.180/2023 REGISTERED BY THE
EAST ZONE WOMEN POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 420 READ WITH
SECTION 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION
ACT, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF VI ADDL.C.M.M.,
BENGALURU.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:46741
CRL.P No. 13247 of 2023

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Accused No.1 in Crime No.180 of 2023 registered by East

Zone Women Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences

punishable under Sections 498-A, 420 read with Section 34 of

IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of DP Act, is before this Court

under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.180 of 2023 was registered by East

Zone Women Police Station, against the petitioner and 4 others

for the aforesaid offences on the basis of complaint dated

28.09.2023 lodged by Smt K Neeraja, the wife of the petitioner

herein. Apprehending arrest in the said case, the petitioner

had filed Crl.Misc.No.11390 of 2023 before the XLV Additional

City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH-46), which

came to be rejected against this petitioner on 07.12.2023.

Therefore, he is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

there was serious matrimonial dispute between the petitioner

and the complainant who are the husband and wife. The
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:46741
CRL.P No. 13247 of 2023

petitioner has filed petition before the competent Court for

restitution of conjugal rights. It is in this background, the

complaint has been filed. Accordingly, he prays to allow the

petition.

5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader

has opposed the bail application and prays to dismiss the

petition.

6. From perusal of the material available on record, it

is seen that the marriage of the petitioner with defacto

complainant was solemnized on 19.11.2020 at Sri

Kodandarama Temple, Bengaluru. The petitioner and the

defacto complainant are MBA graduates and they are working

in a company known as M/s Accenture. The materials made

available to this Court would go to show that the petitioner is

now presently working at Hyderabad. He has filed a petition

under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the

jurisdictional Family Court against the defacto complainant on

17.10.2023. Perusal of the said petition would go to show that

a legal notice dated 29.07.2023 was issued on behalf of the

petitioner to the defacto complainant and the present
-4-
NC: 2023:KHC:46741
CRL.P No. 13247 of 2023

complaint was lodged by the defacto complainant subsequent

to receiving of the said legal notice from the petitioner. The

allegations against the petitioner is that he was ill-treating the

complainant and he also misused her credit cards.

7. Considering the nature of allegations and also

having regard to the fact that petitioner has already initiated

proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act before

the jurisdictional Court against the respondent seeking relief of

restitution of conjugal rights, I am of the opinion that the

prayer made by the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail

has to answered in the affirmative. Hence, the following:

ORDER

Criminal Petition is allowed.

The respondent – police or any other police in the State of

Karnataka are directed to release the petitioner in the event of

his arrest in Crime No.180 of 2023 registered by East Zone

Women Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences

punishable under Sections 498-A, 420 read with Section 34 of

IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of DP Act, subject to the

following conditions:

-5-

NC: 2023:KHC:46741
CRL.P No. 13247 of 2023

1. The Petitioner shall appear before the
Investigating Officer within 15 days from the
date of receipt of the copy of this order and
shall execute a personal bond for a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/-(One lakh only) with two sureties
for the likesum to the satisfaction of the
investigating officer.

2. Petitioner shall regularly appear before the Trial
Court without fail unless exempted by the Trial
Court for valid reasons.

3. Petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution
witness and he shall co-operate with the police
for investigation and appear before them
whenever called upon.

4. The petitioner shall not involve in similar
offences in future.

SD/-

JUDGE

*bgn/-

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation