— IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 19th SEPTEMBER, 2023 SECOND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 34 of 2023 Dr. Virendra Singh Chauhan …..Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand. …..Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Arvind Vashistha,…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CrMMO No. 654 of 2019 . Decided on: November 7, 2019 _ Rajesh and others ………Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents _ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1?…

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFHIMACHALPRADESH,SHIMLA. Cr.MP(M)No.968of2019 . Decidedon:12.6.2019 SimpleKumar………..Petitioner Versus StateofHimachalPradesh……….Respondent Coram: Hon’bleMr.JusticeSandeepSharma,Judge. Whetherapprovedforreporting?1 ForthePetitioner:Mr.VishwaBhushan,Advocate. FortheRespondent:Mr.AshwaniSharmaandMr.Sanjeev Sood,AdditionalAdvocateGenerals withMr.SunnyDhatwalia,Assistant rAdvocateGeneral. SandeepSharma,Judge(oral): BailpetitionernamelySimpleKumar,hasapproachedthis CourtintheinstantproceedingsfiledunderSection439ofCr.PC,praying thereinforgrantofregularbailinconnectionwithFIRNo.30/18dated 9.5.2018,underSection376ofIPCSection4ofPOCSOAct,registered, atSadarWomenPoliceStationatBhiuli,DistrictMandi,H.P. 2.Sequeltoorderdated27.5.2019,passedbythisCourt,Sub InspectorPawanKumar,WomenPoliceStation,Mandi,H.P.,hascome presentinCourtalongwithrecordofthecase.Mr.SanjeevSood,learned AdditionalAdvocateGeneral,hasalsoplacedonrecordstatusreport 1 Whetherthereportersofthelocalpapersmaybeallowedtoseethejudgment? 13/06/201922:00:54:::HCHP 2 preparedonthebasisoftheinvestigationcarriedoutbytheinvestigating agency.Recordperusedandreturned. . 3.Closescrutinyoftherecord/statusreportrevealsthaton 9.5.2018,complainant-prosecutrix(hereinafterreferredtoas”the prosecutrix”)gotherstatementrecordedunderSection154Cr.PC allegingthereinthatsheisstudyingin8thClassatGovernmentMiddle SchoolChhimbaBalahandinthemonthofJanuary,2018,(datenot known),whileshewasgoingtoherhomeafterschool,bailpetitioner forciblytookhertowardsthebushesandsexuallyassaultedheragainst herwishes.Asperprosecutrix,sheaftertwodaysoftheallegedincident informedherstepmotherwithregardtotheallegedincident,butshedid nottakeanyaction.On7.5.2018,whenshewastakentohospitalbyhis grandfatheronaccountofstomachache,ittranspiredthatsheis pregnant.Afterhavingdiscoveredaforesaidfactumofpregnancy, complainantgottheaforesaidstatementrecorded,onthebasisofwhich,…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 537 of 2018 . Date of Decision: 6.3.2019 Fateh Bahadur Thapa ………Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …….Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1? For the petitioner : Mr….

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA      Cr.MP(M) No. 804 of 2018 . Date of Decision No.03.7.2018  __ Shiv Kumar  Another                       …….. Petitioners Versus  State of Himachal Pradesh                        …..Respondent. __ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1  Yes. For the petitioners:   Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate.               For the respondent: Mr.   S.C.Sharma   and   Dinesh   Thakur,  Additional   Advocate   Generals,   and   Mr.  Amit   Kumar   Dhumal,  …