1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6161/2017
Between:
1. Puttaraju,
S/o Late Devegowda,
Age:32 years,
2. Jayalakshmamma,
W/o Late Devegowda,
Age:70 years,
Both are residing at Heragu village,
Dudda Hobli, Hassan Taluk
and District-573 201. …Petitioners
(By Smt. Sharadamba A.R., Advocate)
And
State by Women’s Police Station,
Hassan,
Represented by State Public Prosecutor,
Office of the Advocate General,
High Court Building,
Bengaluru- 560 001. …Respondent
(By Sri Chetan Desai, HCGP.)
2
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the
event of their arrest in Crime No.72/2017 of Hassan
Women Police Station, Hassan District for the offences
punishable under Sections 114, 307, 323, 498A, 504 of
IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders
this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and
the learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent-State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest by the
respondent police in their Crime No.72/2017 registered
in respect of the offences punishable under Sections
498-A, 323, 504, 114, 307 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4
of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The allegation is, the 2nd petitioner is the
mother of the 1st petitioner. The complainant was
married to the 1st petitioner on 9.11.2012 as per their
3
customs. At the time of marriage dowry in cash and
kind was given on the demand of the bride groom side.
Three months after the marriage, the husband started
harassing the wife. However, the couple had two issues
from the marriage. The 2nd petitioner also started to
harass the complainant and insisted her to get money
from her parents. On 10.06.2017, the accused persons
manhandled the complainant, insisted her to get
Rs.1,00,000/- from her parents, otherwise to give
divorce. Since the complainant expressed her
reluctance, the 1st petitioner kicked her and assaulted
her with the chair and the 2nd petitioner caught hold of
her tuft and the husband forcibly administered
pesticides, she was not allowed to throw back and she
lost consciousness.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
submits that the complainant and the petitioners were
living in cordial terms, no such incident as alleged been
4
occurred. In fact, the nephew of the 1st petitioner one
Dilipkumar, aged 15 years had stated that over a trivial
issue, the husband had assaulted the complainant on
the previous evening and left the house and on the next
morning, she voluntarily consumed pesticides. In fact,
the husband himself had admitted her to hospital. The
petitioners even now are ready to take the complainant
to the matrimonial home with all love and affection and
get her treated.
5. Learned HCGP opposes the petition.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, the petition is allowed. Petitioners are
granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.72/2017
registered by the respondent-Police for a limited period
of three weeks.
Within the above period, they shall surrender
before the concerned Court and move for regular bail.
5
Until disposal of the regular bail petition, this
order will be in force.
In the event of their arrest by the respondent-
Police within the above period, they shall be released on
bail on their executing a self bond for a sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with one
surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the
concerned Court.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MR