—
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Rani Mandal @ Mondal @ Anr vs Unknown on 28 March, 2024
Author: Debangsu Basak
Bench: Debangsu Basak
28.03.2024
Item No.23
Ct. No. 29
CHC
Allowed
C.R.M.(A) 944 of 2024
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Sagardighi
Police Station Case No. 53 of 2024 dated 07.02.2024 under
Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending
before the Learned Court of Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad.
And
In the matter of : Rani Mandal @ Mondal @ anr.
…… petitioners
Md. Golam Nure Imrohi
….for the petitioners
Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. A.P.P.
Mr. Sk. Arif Hossain
….for the State
Affidavit-of-service filed in Court be taken on record.
None appears for the de facto complainant despite
service.
There is a delay of about a year from the date of the
incident with the lodgment of the First Information Report.
Post Mortem Report of the victim suggests that death was
due to the effect of poisoning ante mortem in nature. Husband
was arrested.
Police are yet to conclude the investigation.
Considering the period of delay and the nature of the Post
Mortem Report, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Signed By :
CHINMOY
CHAKRABORTY
High Court of
Calcutta
28 th of March
2024 02:20:04 PM
2Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the
petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two
sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting
officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on
further condition that the petitioner no.1, namely, Rani Mandal
@ Mondal will cooperate with the investigation and petitioner
no.2, namely, Sarat Mandal @ Sharat Mondal @ Mandal will
report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the
conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the
petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional
Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused
and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate
order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court
including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without
further reference to this Court.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
CRM(A) 944 of 2024 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)