SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Rupesh Giri @ Rupesh Kumar Giri vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2017

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35029 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -310 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUTAN District-

Rupesh Giri @ Rupesh Kumar Giri, son of Balister Giri, resident of
Village- Mathiya Tola, Police Staton- Nautan, District- West Champaran.

…. …. Petitioner/s
1. The State of Bihar.

…. …. Opposite Party/s

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, A.P.P.


5 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Trial No. 3539 of

2017 arising out of Nautan P.S. Case No. 310 of 2016 instituted for the

offence under Sections 341, 323, 354(A), 379, 457, 504, 506 and 511

of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

charge sheet has been submitted under bailable Section except Section

354 Indian Penal Code and accordingly cognizance has also been taken

under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no any occurrence

committed by this petitioner under Section 354 of the Indian Penal


In the written report, it is alleged that petitioner attempted

to snatch Mangal Sutra of the daughter of the informant but she caught

his collar and, thereafter, the petitioner fled away.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35029 of 2017 (5) dt.21-09-2017


It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that

petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of

surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from

today, in connection with Trial No. 3539 of 2017 arising out of Nautan

P.S. Case No. 310 of 2016, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, subject to the conditions

as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1)

bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the

jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the

trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and

absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason

will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if

petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in

that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail

of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation