SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

State Of Rajasthan vs Mukesh Kumar on 5 September, 2017

S.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 134 / 2017
State Of Rajasthan
Mukesh Kumar S/o Ganpatram, B/c Meghwal, R/o Kumawas, P.S.
Navalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

For Appellant(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP
Judgment / Order

Heard learned Public Prosecutor and perused the judgment

impugned dated 03.10.2016, whereby the learned trial Court has

convicted the accused-respondent for the offence punishable

under Section 457 IPC and Section 7 of Protection of Children

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘POCSO Act’) while acquitting the

accused for the offence under Section 354 IPC.

This leave to appeal has been preferred by the State

challenging the acquittal of the accused for the offence under

Section 354 IPC.

On perusal of the judgment, it is found that learned trial

Court has recorded acquittal of the accused for the offence under

Section 354 IPC only on the technical ground that taking into

consideration the provisions of Section 42 of the POCSO Act only

alternative punishment is required to be awarded.

For ready reference, provision of Section 42 of the POCSO
(2 of 2)

Act, is reproduced as below:-

“42. Alternative punishment:- Where an act or
omission constitutes an offence punishable under
this Act and also under Sections 166A, 354A, 354B,
354C, 354D, 370, 370A, 375, 376, 376A, 376C,
376D, 376E or Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code
(45 of 1860), then, notwithstanding anything
contained in any law for the time being in force, the
offender found guilty of such offence shall be liable
to punishment under this Act or under the Indian
Penal Code as provides for punishment which is
greater in degree.”

Looking to the above said legal position, it is clear that

learned trial Court has correctly acquitted the accused in technical

sense for the offence under Section 354 IPC, as he has been

convicted for the offence punishable under Section 7/8 of POCSO

Act, which is a graver offence.

In view of the above, no infirmity is found in the judgment


Hence the leave to appeal is rejected.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments


Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation